Showing posts with label paris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label paris. Show all posts

Saturday, June 27, 2015

I really wasn't that jazzed about the mango one

Paris holds the key to your heart, or so we were told, by that movie that everyone thinks is Disney but isn't (but that, like Disney, plays very fast and loose with fairly well-documented history). Paris does hold the key to your heart, assuming your heart doesn't easily palpitate, and isn't yet clogged with cholesterol. (Seriously, don't expect a diet of wheatgrass shots and kale salad in Paris. You could probably manage it, but you'd be eating home alone literally every evening.)

Paris is a city so well versed in tourism that it's almost become a cliché, probably more so than London, which maintains a sort of gritty, rainy reputation, and New York, which is iconic but not quite iconic enough. The American Dream is far more complicated than the French one, or so we've been told, and in any case, New York isn't afforded the same dreamy and romantic quality as Paris, in large part due to all the locals warning us in harried tones not to go there, on pain of death. New York is big, and it's scary, and people jerk off on you on the subway. We'd be naive to think that these pleasantries don't exist in every other city in the world, but New York now almost prides itself on being impenetrable (as much as the USA is). It prides itself on its hard outer shell. New York doesn't hold the key to your heart, but it does wear the stilettos that will stab and trample it to a bloody mush. 

(That said, New York is utterly dazzling. And you'll find entire establishments dedicated to those wheatgrass shots and kale salads that Europe just doesn't put up with.)


Bread and circuses? More like crowds and phalluses. 


Paris requires three staples: your time, your better clothes, and your phrasebook.

Honestly? You can get by with no French. But do you want to 'get by'?

The reality is that you always, always get more out of your social experience if you can bungle a few words of French and prove that you're really trying. You can hunt through blog after blog but the truth is the truth: if you don't make an effort to speak a few words of the language, no one else is going to make very much of an effort at all to speak yours. It's purely a system of reciprocity. Parisians are cursed with a poor reputation for being cold and rude, but this reputation was probably invented by someone who went to France, didn't bother to even crack the spine of their phrasebook, and then expected the locals to leap the extra mile and speak their second language.

It makes sense if you think of it that way. French isn't your first language, but English isn't theirs. They've probably been studying English since high school, turning in drab assignments and fumbling speaking exams, wasting their weekends with noses buried in textbooks, just for foreigners to take it entirely for granted. 

Look, life isn't fair, but give a neighbour a hand where you can.


So artsy it hurts. Feel free to cover your eyes.


Dressing in Paris might at first seem a burden, but...it's kind of fun. It's fun not to feel overdressed in heels and a label-less Mexican dress you bought on etsy. Don't feel pressured - it's your damn body, put whatever you want on it - but don't see Parisian fashion sense as your enemy. See it as a challenge.

I'm not going to lie to you: there's a plethora of intimidatingly beautiful women and viciously attractive men in Paris (and really just France in general) but let the city be your playground. If you never felt comfortable enough to don that tight pink see-through dress in your small Pennsylvania town or clunk around in RuPaul heels in Cupar (honestly, walking in heels in the UK is stupidly difficult, not because of the cobblestones, but because everything slopes) then take it all to Paris and strut your shit. 

Let's be honest: sweatpants and white sneakers might get you some looks. Well, not "might" - they will. And I'm not going to sit here and tell you that the rules dictate no sweatpants. Part of travelling, and adventuring, is defying rules. Wear what you want, but bear in mind that Paris's penchant for fashion is not an elite party that you aren't invited to. So join in.


Beware the Star Trek lens flare. It's at large.


Lastly, and probably most importantly, give Paris your time.

No two-day rush-arounds. Don't "spend a day in Paris". Wait, gather your money, set aside your time, and live it. The French aren't fussy eaters, and they aren't speedy eaters either: French dinners often take hours, beginning in the early evening and stretching out into the small hours of the morning (the Spanish and Italians court similar traditions). Afternoon tea can take all afternoon, and nobody expects you to grab a cup and gulp it down, or even to take your coffee to go. If you sit down in a coffee shop, you are down. There's no limit (no rule!) for how long you're allowed to sit there, as long as you order at least one thing per hour. Amy Plum explains this lovingly - the idea that you're renting your table, and while you're renting it, it belongs to you.

Time is of incredible value in Paris, and in great European cities in general. Nobody expects you to rush around (though if you do, it's okay, because European cities are so small that we're used to going everywhere on foot. This is why Europeans have two walking speeds: breakneck or grandfatherly. We're either chilling out, or booking it across the city to work).

Don't barge around the city; if you miss your train, there's another one. Don't scream your coffee order; the guy making your cappuccino is European, and if he's not at breakneck, then he's moving at his grandfatherly pace. And that's okay. Don't rush by the glorious things that there are to see; stop, breathe them in, taste the air. Look at the gaps between cobblestones, and the rivets that hold together the Tour Eiffel. Look beyond the art and at the Louvre itself. The way it's been constructed, and has stood for centuries, looked at by millions of eyes. Europe didn't battle through Rome and the Reformation and Napoleon and two world wars to be rushed around, glanced at, taken like a shot of espresso. 

HYOH. But remember that time is of the essence. Not in the way you might think.

Monday, June 22, 2015

With all the politics and the mind games

I love skies. Cloudy skies, sunny skies, night skies. Morning skies. Skies that look stained with coloured dyes; skies that are angry with rain.

It's funny to think that we're all under the same sky, even as far apart as we are, and with all the different lives that we lead. I like this about travel; no matter how far we are from home, the sky is still the same one that we look at from our bedroom windows. It's still the same one that all the people we miss can see.


That sky doesn't look very paxful. 


Whenever I'm going anywhere I (a) always take my camera, and (b) always try to photograph the sky, no matter if it's black and spoiling for rain or utterly blue and cloudless. With all the monuments and cobblestones and temples and gardens, rivers and domes and mosaics that rest at or below our eye level, we tend to miss the glory of a good sky: ever-changing, never the same way twice. The sky is as alive as we are.


It's always sunny in Montmartre. I hope.


My grandfather was a painter and a draughtsman, and his passion was clouds. He would sit outside in his patio in Woking and watch the clouds for as long as anyone could stand, and when he painted them, they were filled with that life I see in them. He saw the clouds as art, and the sky as a canvas, and rightly so.

Next time you're pointing your camera at your feet, stop and turn it upwards. What you will capture is something no one will ever see again. 

Friday, June 19, 2015

Enchiladas sounded really good, actually

Since this blog is so young, but is already shaping itself (itself, because I seriously don't feel that I have even a smudge of control over my writing, and it's kind of a problem) into a creature of travel, I've decided that my book talks will all be based around travel books: travel memoirs, travel guides, and maybe even other travel blogs (there are a shit ton, and so many good ones).

I've recently seen a resurgence of my own interest in France, for numerous reasons, some of which make sense to me and some of which don't, and in this flurry of Francophilia I scrambled into the book store like that deer that got trapped in that bar and bulldozed a path to the travel section. I snatched anything off the shelf that seemed vaguely France-related, one of those books being Samantha Vérant's Seven Letters From Paris. I'm not ashamed to say that I enjoyed it immensely. I'm not ashamed to say that while I might stomp around with metal in my face and rip a swear like a trucker on a night shift, I'm a sad sucker for a sappy romance, as long as that romance exists realistically, par exemple, in a memoir. I seldom give a crap about fictional couples, but shit if a true story doesn't get me in the feels.


The gorgeous cover doesn't hurt, either.


Seven Letters capitalizes on the intense romance of travel - of meeting someone foreign, someone mysterious, and being swept into a new culture, specifically one built around a Romance language and a country filled with famously sweeping architecture. Is it a little saccharine? Un peu, but it's no more ashamed of this than I was of reading it. It knows it's an American dream, and it's fine with it.

Mixing romance and travel is an interesting study, because it's become the ultimate fairytale: meeting someone from a strange land, falling madly in love, and spending the rest of one's life in someplace most of the English-speaking world only sees in National Geographic. What we have to wonder is if this is feasible, or if Sam Vérant is the exception to the rule. How many people pursue this dream and fall short chasing it, and are left with very little to show for it?

Or, what do we want to show for it? A good time, or a happily ever after?

I think it's dark to condemn that dream - you know, to throw travel romance like spaghetti at a wall. Is there anything wrong with pursuing mystery in romance? No, and to think that there is, is to shit all over the whole concept of romance. I'm not a romantic, but human lives are damnably short. It just requires degrees of caution, I suppose, and an open eye. Foreign romance, after all, involves foreign people. As a person who lived as 'foreign' for a number of years, I can tell you that it's not an adjustment that's easy. And there wasn't even a language barrier involved (there were, however, dialect hurdles that ended in several skinned knees).

Sam Vérant's story is hopeful and beautiful, but it doesn't question the social roadblocks of foreign romance with any sort of realism, and I think this is both the downfall of the idealists and fodder for the cynics. A person who was born on a different continent from you was also born into a totally different culture, and this hits a lot of people like an electric shock. Like I've said before, sneezing. The looks I got in Canada for sneezing into my hands were caustic. The looks I got for using the slang I'd grown up with were worse.

So I suppose, then, that in foreign romance, you reap what you sow. If you're looking for marriage, and looking for it hard, you may well find it. But if you head out looking for a good time, you can bet your ass you'll get one.

HYOH. And let fun be fun; enjoy the ride. Romance doesn't need to be a battle, and if it is, then it's not the dream. Our lives are far too short.

I thought about it but then I realized they were all sleeping so

I feel like there's sort of a strange stigma surrounding "the beaten path" and I kind of have a problem with it. 

A few months ago I was trawling for info on the PCT (thank Cheryl Strayed for my odd fixation with it) and I stumbled upon the acronym: HYOH. It means, "Hike Your Own Hike". I think this perfectly sums up the problem with the 'beaten path' and the disdain that seems to surround it. 

I've been on the beaten path. I've been off it, too. I wasn't disappointed by either. 


Beaten path? This monster paved that path.

But it all boils down to this: are you hiking your own hike? Are you walking your own trail? I'm not going to put a price or a label on the joy I felt when I watched the hilarious, garish light show of le Tour Eiffel or when I stood at the peak of the white caterthun in Brechin. A piece of modern art that looks like scaffolding has no more or less right to exist or be loved than a Pictish fort. It is what life is: a clean-cut matter of opinion. 


There's is a path that runs neatly around Hamilton Marsh, but it's hardly a beaten one.
 


I'm not sure any path, by definition, can really be unbeaten. Wherever you go, someone's been there before. It's the problem I have with articles like this (don't hate me! I actually love Buzzfeed. Buzzfeed is my encyclopaedia, and I'm amazed I could spell encyclopaedia) that discount the travel experiences of people who walk the 'beaten path'. Buzzfeed says that "literally everyone" has been to the Great Pyramids of Giza, to which I have to reply...

And?

Does that mean that the Pyramids are now not worth seeing? Instead, they encourage travellers to visit Petra, an ancient city in Jordan. Petra is breathtaking - one of my must-sees - but can't we see both? Can't we hike our own hike without being judged by "literally everyone"?

There's a reason why the so-called "beaten path" has been treaded by so many. Because it's worth treading. The Palace of Versailles and the Marrakech Medina are worth seeing. Go to Edinburgh and Toronto and Brazil's carnival if you want to. I think those are today's key words: if you want to. Go where you want to go; do what you want to do. Travel where you want to travel. You don't deserve to be judged for wanting to see popular attractions or monuments. 

There's a reason why they're popular.